333 images (+111)

This image, and an identical image without the teddy bear, were at the center of a long edit war on Wikipedia’s Missionary Position page, with almost 50 reversions occurring.  (It has been enshrined on the hilarious list of “Wikipedia’s Lamest Edit Wars”) Is the bear a cute and humanizing addition to what would otherwise be mere anatomical draughtsmanship?  Or does it suggests that she is underage, or that “this is a mentally disabled woman with a child’s mind being raped, perhaps by a relative”?  Opinions vary, as with all porn. Me, I’m more concerned with her nostrils and the absence of her left shoulder.

This image, and an identical image without the teddy bear, were at the center of a long edit war on Wikipedia’s Missionary Position page, with almost 50 reversions occurring.  (It has been enshrined on the hilarious list of “Wikipedia’s Lamest Edit Wars”)

Is the bear a cute and humanizing addition to what would otherwise be mere anatomical draughtsmanship?  Or does it suggests that she is underage, or that “this is a mentally disabled woman with a child’s mind being raped, perhaps by a relative”?  Opinions vary, as with all porn.

Me, I’m more concerned with her nostrils and the absence of her left shoulder.

31 May 2010 • 2000s M/f ambiguity censorship little-girl pen and ink vanilla missionary